Viorel P. Tudor v. Creative Management Co., PPM Towing and KTL Enterprises, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 21, 2021
Docket01-21-00154-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Viorel P. Tudor v. Creative Management Co., PPM Towing and KTL Enterprises, Inc. (Viorel P. Tudor v. Creative Management Co., PPM Towing and KTL Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Viorel P. Tudor v. Creative Management Co., PPM Towing and KTL Enterprises, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Opinion issued October 21, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00154-CV ——————————— VIOREL P. TUDOR, Appellant V. PPM TOWING, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1159921

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Viorel P. Tudor, has neither paid the required fees nor established

indigence for purposes of costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see

also Tex. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.851(b), 101.041; Order Regarding Fees

Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158. On April

16, 2021, Tudor was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellate

costs were not paid, or indigence was not established, by May 17, 2021. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Tudor did not adequately respond to the Court’s notice.

Further, Tudor has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the

preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). On June 24, 2021,

Tudor was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if Tudor did not submit

written evidence that he had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the

preparation of the clerk’s record by July 26, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

Tudor did not adequately respond to the Court’s notice.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and

for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We

dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Farris.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Viorel P. Tudor v. Creative Management Co., PPM Towing and KTL Enterprises, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/viorel-p-tudor-v-creative-management-co-ppm-towing-and-ktl-enterprises-texapp-2021.