Violette v. Ball

28 F. Cas. 1218, 2 D.C. 102, 2 Cranch 102

This text of 28 F. Cas. 1218 (Violette v. Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Violette v. Ball, 28 F. Cas. 1218, 2 D.C. 102, 2 Cranch 102 (circtddc 1814).

Opinion

The Court

(Thruston, J., absent,)

refused to instruct the jury that the petitioner was entitled to freedom by being sent from the city of Washington to Virginia for sale, and not being sold, brought back to the city, after an absence of eight or nine months.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 F. Cas. 1218, 2 D.C. 102, 2 Cranch 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/violette-v-ball-circtddc-1814.