Violeta Salazar v. Jesse Lee Burg
Opinion
Opinion issued February 28, 2013
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00045-CV ——————————— VIOLETA SALAZAR, Appellant V. JESSE LEE BURG, Appellee
On Appeal from the 25th District Court Colorado County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 23309
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Violeta Salazar, has neither paid the required filing fee for this
appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must
pay—at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order.”), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing
indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2011), §
51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011) (listing fees in court of
appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and
the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation,
Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app.
A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). On January 16, 2013, appellant was
notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid by
January 28, 2013. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal,
appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement
of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).
We dismiss the appeal for failure to pay the filing fee. We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Sharp, and Huddle.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Violeta Salazar v. Jesse Lee Burg (Violeta Salazar v. Jesse Lee Burg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.