Violet A. Stapleton v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security

Fourth Circuit

Violet A. Stapleton v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security

54 F.3d 774, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17618, 1995 WL 298113

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 17, 1995

Docket94-1966

StatusPublished

This text of 54 F.3d 774 (Violet A. Stapleton v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Violet A. Stapleton v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security, 54 F.3d 774, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17618, 1995 WL 298113 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

54 F.3d 774
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Violet A. STAPLETON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-1966.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 17, 1995.
Decided May 17, 1995.

Violet A. Stapleton, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Albert Lloret, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, VA; Charlotte Jefferson Hardnett, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Philadelphia, PA.

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order affirming the Secretary's denial of supplemental security income benefits. Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Stapleton v. Shalala, No. CA-90-58-B (W.D.Va. June 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

54 F.3d 774
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Violet A. STAPLETON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-1966.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 17, 1995.
Decided May 17, 1995.

Violet A. Stapleton, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Albert Lloret, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, VA; Charlotte Jefferson Hardnett, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Philadelphia, PA.

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order affirming the Secretary's denial of supplemental security income benefits. Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Stapleton v. Shalala, No. CA-90-58-B (W.D.Va. June 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 F.3d 774, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17618, 1995 WL 298113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/violet-a-stapleton-v-shirley-s-chater-commissioner-ca4-1995.