Violano v. Maryland Casualty Co.
This text of 249 A.D. 627 (Violano v. Maryland Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages alleged to have been occasioned by fraud, judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J.,. Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Carswell and Davis, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial on the ground that a prima facie case of negligence and fraud was made out.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 A.D. 627, 292 N.Y.S. 166, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/violano-v-maryland-casualty-co-nyappdiv-1936.