Vio Chemical Co. v. Hartman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vio Chemical Co. v. Hartman

126 A.D. 924, 111 N.Y.S. 1148

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 126 A.D. 924 (Vio Chemical Co. v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vio Chemical Co. v. Hartman, 126 A.D. 924, 111 N.Y.S. 1148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the plaintiff failed to prove the cause of action alleged; that the daughter was the agent of the defendant in the execution of the papers, and that there was no proof of partnership between the daughter and the mother. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the defendant, by failure to plead copartnership or joint liability, waived the same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the plaintiff failed to prove the cause of action alleged; that the daughter was the agent of the defendant in the execution of the papers, and that there was no proof of partnership between the daughter and the mother. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the defendant, by failure to plead copartnership or joint liability, waived the same.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 A.D. 924, 111 N.Y.S. 1148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vio-chemical-co-v-hartman-nyappdiv-1908.