Vinyard v. State

1927 OK CR 149, 256 P. 65, 37 Okla. Crim. 53, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 20
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMay 21, 1927
DocketNo. A-5823.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1927 OK CR 149 (Vinyard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vinyard v. State, 1927 OK CR 149, 256 P. 65, 37 Okla. Crim. 53, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 20 (Okla. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The' plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Caddo county on a charge of transporting whisky and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

It appears from the record that the sheriff at Ana-darko observed defendant and another person together, and from the conduct of defendant believed he was transporting whisky. He saw defendant and this other person enter a toilet. He approached it and entered the open door and saw defendant in the act of handing a pint bottle to the other person. Defendant then threw the bottle against the wall and broke it and said to the sheriff: “You didn’t get it.” The sheriff testified that it was whisky. This evidence is corroborated by the person with defendant, although he testified that he would not swear that it was whisky in the bottle. Defendant testified that the bottle contained O. K. Specific, which he was preparing to take internally for gonorrhea.

Under the evidence, there was no invasion of the rights of defendant in the fact that the officer did not have a search warrant at the time he approached defendant. The weight and sufficiency of the evidence is for the jury. We see no reason for disturbing the judgment.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hammonds v. State
1941 OK CR 184 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1927 OK CR 149, 256 P. 65, 37 Okla. Crim. 53, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vinyard-v-state-oklacrimapp-1927.