Vinyard v. North Side Canal Co.
280 U.S. 520, 50 S. Ct. 67
Opinion
The appeal is dismissed and certiorari is- denied for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question on the authority of St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co. v. Shephard, 240 U. S. 240; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Ry., 228 U. S. 326.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vinyard v. North Side Canal Co., 280 U.S. 520, 50 S. Ct. 67 (1929).
280 U.S. 520 (Vinyard v. North Side Canal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 326 (Supreme Court, 1913)
St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Shepherd
240 U.S. 240 (Supreme Court, 1916)
Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton
252 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1920)