Vinson v. United States Marshals Service
This text of 459 F. App'x 221 (Vinson v. United States Marshals Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Wayne Vinson appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing Vinson’s claims brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (2006), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vinson v. U.S. Marshals Service, No. 0:10-cv-00079-RMG, 2011 WL 3903199 (D.S.C. Sept. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
459 F. App'x 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vinson-v-united-states-marshals-service-ca4-2011.