Vinson v. United States Marshals Service
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Wayne Vinson appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing Vinson’s claims brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (2006), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vinson v. U.S. Marshals Service, No. 0:10-cv-00079-RMG, 2011 WL 3903199 (D.S.C. Sept. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
459 F. App'x 221 (Vinson v. United States Marshals Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.