Vinson v. United States Marshals Service

459 F. App'x 221
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 20, 2011
DocketNo. 11-7316
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 459 F. App'x 221 (Vinson v. United States Marshals Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vinson v. United States Marshals Service, 459 F. App'x 221 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Vinson appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing Vinson’s claims brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (2006), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vinson v. U.S. Marshals Service, No. 0:10-cv-00079-RMG, 2011 WL 3903199 (D.S.C. Sept. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aursby v. Richardson
W.D. Virginia, 2022
Paul Thompson, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia
878 F.3d 89 (Fourth Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
459 F. App'x 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vinson-v-united-states-marshals-service-ca4-2011.