Vinson v. THE WINWELL COMPANIES, INC.

224 S.W.3d 269, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 5064, 2005 WL 1536330
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 30, 2005·No. 08-05-00041-CV·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

Pending before the Court on its own initiative is the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(b). This Court possesses the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prose *270 cution when an appellant in a civil case fails to timely file its brief and gives no reasonable explanation for such failure. See Tex.R.App.P. 38.8(a)(1).

On December 20, 2004, Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal in this cause. As of this date, no Appellants brief nor motion for extension of time has been filed with the Court. On May 16, 2005, this Courts clerk sent a letter to the parties indicating the Courts intent to dismiss the case for want of prosecution absent a response from any party within ten days to show grounds for continuing the appeal. No response has been received as of this date. Accordingly, pursuant to Tex.RApp.P. 42.3(b) and (c), we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vinson v. THE WINWELL COMPANIES, INC., 224 S.W.3d 269, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 5064, 2005 WL 1536330 (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

224 S.W.3d 269 (Vinson v. THE WINWELL COMPANIES, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of El Paso v. Berry
224 S.W.3d 269 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)