Vinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vinson v. State

575 So. 2d 1371, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2176, 1991 WL 32099

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 13, 1991

DocketNo. 90-0279

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 575 So. 2d 1371 (Vinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vinson v. State, 575 So. 2d 1371, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2176, 1991 WL 32099 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence Vinson was duly convicted upon trial by jury and sentenced for burglary of a dwelling with assault and battery. He appeals. We reverse and remand.

In our opinion the trial court committed fundamental reversible error by instructing the jury on the presumption of intent arising from stealthy entry when the entry was manifestly not in fact stealthy. We reverse upon authority of Peters v. State, 76 So.2d 147 (Fla.1954) and remand for a new trial.

In addition we reverse the imposition of court costs and public defender fee against Mr. Vinson because he was not given notice and an opportunity to be heard as to such matters. See Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988) and Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent herewith.

DOWNEY, GARRETT, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H., (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI