Vinson v. State

575 So. 2d 1371, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2176, 1991 WL 32099
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 13, 1991·No. No. 90-0279·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence Vinson was duly convicted upon trial by jury and sentenced for burglary of a dwelling with assault and battery. He appeals. We reverse and remand.

In our opinion the trial court committed fundamental reversible error by instructing the jury on the presumption of intent arising from stealthy entry when the entry was manifestly not in fact stealthy. We reverse upon authority of Peters v. State, 76 So.2d 147 (Fla.1954) and remand for a new trial.

In addition we reverse the imposition of court costs and public defender fee against Mr. Vinson because he was not given notice and an opportunity to be heard as to such matters. See Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988) and Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent herewith.

DOWNEY, GARRETT, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H., (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vinson v. State, 575 So. 2d 1371, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2176, 1991 WL 32099 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

575 So. 2d 1371 (Vinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daughtry v. State
804 So. 2d 426 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Frazier v. State
664 So. 2d 985 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Harrell v. State
647 So. 2d 1016 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)