Vinson v. State

152 So. 260, 228 Ala. 105, 1934 Ala. LEXIS 118
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 18, 1934·No. 8 Div. 568.·Published

Opinion

KNIGHT, Justice.

This cause appears in this court on petition of Willie Vinson for writ of certiorari to review and revise the opinion and judgment of the Court of Appeals. In re Willie Vinson v. State of Alabama, 152 So. 259.

We will not disturb the finding of facts by the Court of Appeals, and that court has applied the law as heretofore pronounced by this court in other similar cases.

The court properly overruled the defendant’s motion to quash the affidavit because of the alleged errors or irregularities in the appearance bond. Looney v. State (Ala. App.) *106 140 So. 181; 1 Williams v. State, 113 Ala. 58, 21 So. 463; Walker v. State, 108 Ala. 56, 19 So. 353; Miller v. State, 110 Ala. 69, 20 So. 392. Nor do we find any error was committed by the Court of Appeals in the application of the law to the facts in the case.

Writ 'denied.

ANDERSON, C. X, and THOMAS and BROWN, JX, concur.
1

25 Ala. App. 23.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vinson v. State, 152 So. 260, 228 Ala. 105, 1934 Ala. LEXIS 118 (Ala. 1934).

152 So. 260 (Vinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vinson v. State
152 So. 259 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1933)
Looney v. State
140 So. 181 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1932)
Walker v. State
108 Ala. 56 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1895)
Miller v. State
110 Ala. 69 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1895)
Williams v. State
113 Ala. 58 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1896)