Vinson v. DAUGHHETEE

Missouri Court of Appeals

Vinson v. DAUGHHETEE

294 S.W.3d 135, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1502, 2009 WL 3259980

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 13, 2009

DocketED 92369

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 294 S.W.3d 135 (Vinson v. DAUGHHETEE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vinson v. DAUGHHETEE, 294 S.W.3d 135, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1502, 2009 WL 3259980 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Ray Vinson, Jr., appeals the summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County in favor of the defendants, Deanna Daughhetee, Michael Bell, and Elliott Liss. 1 Because *136 the plaintiff presents a new issue on appeal that was not before the trial court during the summary-judgment proceedings, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5). 2

1

. Vinson appears individually and as trustee of the Ray Vinson Revocable Trust. Daugh- *136 hetee appears individually and as trustee of the Deanna Lynn Daughhetee Vinson Revocable Trust.

2

. We also grant the defendant’s renewed motion to strike portions of the record on appeal, the plaintiff's appendix, and related portions of the plaintiff’s brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI