Vinson v. Ardis

81 Ala. 271
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1886·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

CLOPTON, J.

— In the absence of actual possession, either the legal title, or special property accompanied with the right of immediate possession, is essential to maintain detinue, or the substitutional statutory action. The only title on which plaintiff bases a right to recover the horse [272]*272in controversy, is a mortgage executed to the firm of Reid, Yinson & Co. The legal title to partnership assets vests in the partnership; and an individual member has no separate ownership, or exclusive right of possession, to any particular article of the partnership property. In no aspect of the case is the plaintiff, not having actual possession, nor the legal title, entitled to maintain the action. The rulings of the court, if erroneous, which we do not decide, are in such case without injury.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vinson v. Ardis, 81 Ala. 271 (Ala. 1886).

81 Ala. 271 (Vinson v. Ardis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bolton v. Cuthbert
31 So. 358 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1902)
Thomason v. Silvey & Co.
123 Ala. 694 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)
Sloan v. Wilson
117 Ala. 583 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1897)