Vinson Larry Bruce v. State
This text of Vinson Larry Bruce v. State (Vinson Larry Bruce v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________
No. 06-11-00122-CR ______________________________
VINSON LARRY BRUCE, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 102nd Judicial District Court Bowie County, Texas Trial Court No. 09F0385-102
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss MEMORANDUM OPINION
Vinson Larry Bruce has filed pro se a notice of appeal from his conviction of aggravated
robbery. On our review of the clerk’s record, we noted that the trial court’s certification of right
of appeal stated that this was a plea agreement case and that Bruce has no right of appeal.
Unless a certification, showing that a defendant has the right of appeal, is in the record, we
must dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
Because the trial court’s certification affirmatively shows Bruce has no right of appeal, and
because the record before us does not reflect that the certification is incorrect, see Dears v. State,
154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005), we must dismiss the appeal.
We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice
Date Submitted: July 18, 2011 Date Decided: July 19, 2011
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vinson Larry Bruce v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vinson-larry-bruce-v-state-texapp-2011.