Vinoly v. Petluck
This text of 502 So. 2d 525 (Vinoly v. Petluck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because Troton, Inc., an entity separate from appellants, acquired the subject property, Troton’s purchase did not affect appellants’ agreement to pay appellees’ commission for the 1973 sale of the property. We therefore affirm the trial court’s Amended Final Judgment. See Ed Skoda Ford, Inc. v. P & P Paint & Body Shop, Inc., 277 So.2d 818 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 284 So.2d 395 (Fla.1973); Mease v. Warm Mineral Springs, Inc., 128 So.2d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 132 So.2d 291 (Fla.1961); Marks v. Green, 122 So.2d 491 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
502 So. 2d 525, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 556, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vinoly-v-petluck-fladistctapp-1987.