Home/New York Court of Appeals/Vinnik v. 795 Fifth Avenue Corp.

Vinnik v. 795 Fifth Avenue Corp.

465 N.E.2d 45, 62 N.Y.2d 698, 476 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4304
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 3, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 465 N.E.2d 45 (Vinnik v. 795 Fifth Avenue Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vinnik v. 795 Fifth Avenue Corp., 465 N.E.2d 45, 62 N.Y.2d 698, 476 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4304 (N.Y. 1984).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Appellate Division and for the reasons stated by that court (94 AD2d 685) that the documents submitted by defendants on their motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211 (subd [a], pars 1, 7) are not sufficient, without more, to constitute a defense to the causes of action alleged in the complaint warranting its dismissal.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wacht-ler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chemical Bank v. 635 Park Avenue Corp.
155 Misc. 2d 433 (New York Supreme Court, 1992)
Four Seasons Hotels Ltd. v. Vinnik
127 A.D.2d 310 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Demas v. 325 West End Avenue Corp.
127 A.D.2d 476 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
465 N.E.2d 45, 62 N.Y.2d 698, 476 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vinnik-v-795-fifth-avenue-corp-ny-1984.