Vinlis Construction Co. v. Roreck
This text of 320 N.E.2d 277 (Vinlis Construction Co. v. Roreck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion, insofar as leave is sought to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the denial of plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, dismissed upon the ground [716]*716that said portion of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Motion, insofar as leave is sought to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the dismissal of the complaint as against defendants Auslander and Public Service Heat and Power Co., Inc. denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 N.E.2d 277, 35 N.Y.2d 715, 361 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vinlis-construction-co-v-roreck-ny-1974.