Vining v. Herman
This text of 156 So. 891 (Vining v. Herman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the proceedings to foreclose a mortgage lien upon lands, it appears that when the mortgage was executed a third person .was residing upon and was in *822 the actual adverse occupancy of a portion of the land under a verbal contract of purchase of long standing, there being a residence with a fence around it.
■ It appears that the adverse occupant of a portion of the land did not know of the mortgage until after it was executed; and no equity is shown to estop such adverse occupant from intervening and defending against the mortgage.
“Where at the time property is mortgaged it is actually occupied by others' than the mortgagor, the mortgagee is thereby put upon notice to enquire as to the rights of the occupants.” H. N. 2, Crozier v. Ange, 85 Fla. 120, 95 So. 426.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 So. 891, 116 Fla. 821, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vining-v-herman-fla-1934.