Vining v. Herman

156 So. 891, 116 Fla. 821, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1170
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 12, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 156 So. 891 (Vining v. Herman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vining v. Herman, 156 So. 891, 116 Fla. 821, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1170 (Fla. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the proceedings to foreclose a mortgage lien upon lands, it appears that when the mortgage was executed a third person .was residing upon and was in *822 the actual adverse occupancy of a portion of the land under a verbal contract of purchase of long standing, there being a residence with a fence around it.

■ It appears that the adverse occupant of a portion of the land did not know of the mortgage until after it was executed; and no equity is shown to estop such adverse occupant from intervening and defending against the mortgage.

“Where at the time property is mortgaged it is actually occupied by others' than the mortgagor, the mortgagee is thereby put upon notice to enquire as to the rights of the occupants.” H. N. 2, Crozier v. Ange, 85 Fla. 120, 95 So. 426.

Affirmed.

, Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown, and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crozier v. Ange
95 So. 426 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 So. 891, 116 Fla. 821, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vining-v-herman-fla-1934.