Vinh-Alkire-Clemen v. Castle Medical Center
This text of 226 P.3d 521 (Vinh-Alkire-Clemen v. Castle Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
VINH-ALKIRE-CLEMEN, Claimant-Appellant,
v.
CASTLE MEDICAL CENTER, Employer-Appellee, and
CRAWFORD AND COMPANY, Insurance Adjuster-Appellee.
Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL PURSUANT TO HRAP RULE 24
NAKAMURA, C.J., FOLEY and FUJISE, JJ.
Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) Claimant-Appellant Vinh Alkire-Clemen (Appellant) filed a notice of appeal on August 18, 2009; (2) Appellant did not pay the filing fee; (3) on October 30, 2009, the appellate clerk informed Appellant: (a) the record on appeal could not be filed without payment of the filing fee pursuant to Rule 11(b)(2) of the Hawai`i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) or an executed motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to HRAP Rule 24; and (b) the matter would be called to the attention of the court on November 6, 2009 for such action as the court deemed proper, which may include dismissal of the appeal; and (4) Appellant failed to pay the filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed pursuant to HRAP Rule 24.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 P.3d 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vinh-alkire-clemen-v-castle-medical-center-hawapp-2010.