Vines v. State

563 So. 2d 58, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 129, 1990 WL 57562
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 16, 1990·No. 5 Div. 547·Published

Opinion

[59] AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

McMILLAN, Judge.

On remand by the Alabama Supreme Court for consideration in light of Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255, 109 S.Ct. 1038, 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989), we hold that this cause is due to be affirmed because appellant’s claim that his sentence constituted cruel and unusual punishment is without merit. Appellant had two prior felonies and was sentenced under the Habitual Felony Offender Act pursuant to his conviction of attempted rape, a Class B felony. His 20-year sentence was well within the statutory range.

Affirmed.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vines v. State, 563 So. 2d 58, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 129, 1990 WL 57562 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

563 So. 2d 58 (Vines v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. Reed
489 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1989)