Vines v. State

563 So. 2d 58, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 129, 1990 WL 57562
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedMarch 16, 1990
Docket5 Div. 547
StatusPublished

This text of 563 So. 2d 58 (Vines v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vines v. State, 563 So. 2d 58, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 129, 1990 WL 57562 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

[59]*59AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

McMILLAN, Judge.

On remand by the Alabama Supreme Court for consideration in light of Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255, 109 S.Ct. 1038, 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989), we hold that this cause is due to be affirmed because appellant’s claim that his sentence constituted cruel and unusual punishment is without merit. Appellant had two prior felonies and was sentenced under the Habitual Felony Offender Act pursuant to his conviction of attempted rape, a Class B felony. His 20-year sentence was well within the statutory range.

Affirmed.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris v. Reed
489 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
563 So. 2d 58, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 129, 1990 WL 57562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vines-v-state-alacrimapp-1990.