Vineland National Bank & Trust Co. v. Rothman
22 A.2d 276, 130 N.J. Eq. 225, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 591
Opinion
.The complainant secured a decree setting aside a mortgage executed with intent to defraud it. N. J. S. A. 25:2-13.
We have carefully examined the fact findings of the learned Vice-Chancellor, and are satisfied that they were in all respects proper.
The decree is affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Raeebrty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vineland National Bank & Trust Co. v. Rothman, 22 A.2d 276, 130 N.J. Eq. 225, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 591 (N.J. Ct. App. 1941).
22 A.2d 276 (Vineland National Bank & Trust Co. v. Rothman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.