VINELAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. Township of Pennsauken

Supreme Court of New Jersey

VINELAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. Township of Pennsauken

950 A.2d 902, 195 N.J. 513, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 621

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 16, 2008·Published

Opinion

The Court having been advised by counsel that the Township of Pennsauken and Cherokee Pennsauken, LLC, have agreed to terminate the latter’s right to develop the property that is the subject of the within litigation,

And the parties having further agreed that no issue in controversy remains pending before the Court,

And good cause appearing;

IT IS ORDERED that the within appeal is dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court having been advised by counsel that the Township of Pennsauken and Cherokee Pennsauken, LLC, have agreed to terminate the latter’s right to develop the property that is the subject of the within litigation,

And the parties having further agreed that no issue in controversy remains pending before the Court,

And good cause appearing;

IT IS ORDERED that the within appeal is dismissed as moot.

VINELAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. Township of Pennsauken, 950 A.2d 902, 195 N.J. 513, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 621 (N.J. 2008).

Pincite

950 A.2d 902 (VINELAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. Township of Pennsauken) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.