Vine v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF TOWN OF NORTH BRANFORD
895 A.2d 794, 277 Conn. 918, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 82
Opinion
The petition by the named defendant for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn. App. 1 (AC 25837), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the variance granted by the named defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the town of North Branford, was improper because the hardship was merely financial?”
KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vine v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF TOWN OF NORTH BRANFORD, 895 A.2d 794, 277 Conn. 918, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 82 (Colo. 2006).
895 A.2d 794 (Vine v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF TOWN OF NORTH BRANFORD) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vine v. Zoning Board of Appeals
927 A.2d 958 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2007)
Vine v. Zoning Board of Appeals
916 A.2d 5 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2007)