Vine v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF TOWN OF NORTH BRANFORD
This text of 895 A.2d 794 (Vine v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF TOWN OF NORTH BRANFORD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition by the named defendant for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn. App. 1 (AC 25837), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the variance granted by the named defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the town of North Branford, was improper because the hardship was merely financial?”
KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
895 A.2d 794, 277 Conn. 918, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vine-v-zoning-board-of-appeals-of-town-of-north-branford-conn-2006.