Vine v. Vine

42 A. 871, 21 R.I. 190, 1899 R.I. LEXIS 23
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedFebruary 10, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 42 A. 871 (Vine v. Vine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vine v. Vine, 42 A. 871, 21 R.I. 190, 1899 R.I. LEXIS 23 (R.I. 1899).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

^ By Gen. Laws R. I. cap. 222, § 4, cap. 195, § 14, exclusive jurisdiction in divorce and incidental matters arising therein is vested in the Appellate Division of this court. We are of the opinion, therefore, that no action can be .maintained in any other court to recover an allowance made to a wife for her support during the pendency of the petition for divorce, but that recourse must be had to the remedies prescribed by the rule of this Division.

*191 Dennis J. Holland, for plaintiff. Franklin P. Oiuen and John P. Beagan, for defendant.

Moreover, a decree for an allowance penclente lite is an interlocutory decree, subject to revocation or modification at any time by tbe court which made it, and consequently cannot be the foundation of an action as upon a final judgment. i Wait’s Actions and Defences, 187, § 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Horn v. Van Horn
93 P. 670 (Washington Supreme Court, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 A. 871, 21 R.I. 190, 1899 R.I. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vine-v-vine-ri-1899.