Vincin Campise v. Hector Davilla, Victor Meriles and Olonzo Robles

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-22-00241-CV

VINCIN CAMPISE, Appellant v.

HECTOR DAVILLA, VICTOR MERILES AND OLONZO ROBLES, Appellees

From the 82nd District Court Robertson County, Texas Trial Court No. 22-04-21435-CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 26, 2022, appellant, Vincin Campise, filed a notice of appeal challenging

the trial court’s June 27, 2022 order granting a motion to transfer venue in favor of

appellees, Hector Davilla, Victor Meriles, and Olonzo Robles. We notified appellant that,

unless he showed grounds for continuing the appeal, we would dismiss this appeal for

want of jurisdiction because it appeared to be an appeal of a non-appealable interlocutory

order. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 15.064(a) (providing that “[n]o interlocutory appeal shall lie from the [venue] determination”); see also TEX. R. CIV. P.

87(6) (stating that “[t]here shall be no interlocutory appeals from [an adverse venue]

determination”).

Appellant has not responded to our notice showing grounds for continuing this

appeal. We do not have jurisdiction over the order transferring venue. See TEX. CIV. PRAC.

& REM. CODE ANN. § 15.064(a); TEX. R. CIV. P. 87(6); see also McCray v. Reid, No. 10-06-0117-

CV, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 8279, at *1 (Tex. App.—Waco Sept. 20, 2006, pet. denied) (mem.

op.) (dismissing an appeal from an interlocutory order transferring venue for want of

jurisdiction). We therefore dismiss this appeal.

STEVE SMITH Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed August 31, 2022 [CV06]

Campise v. Davilla, et al. Page 2