Vinci Brands LLC v. Coach Services, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 7, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-05138·Unknown

Opinion

fil NELSON MULLINS NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW K. Pai Nettl 201 17th Street NW, Suite 1700 T! 404.322.6116 Atlanta, GA 30363 paige.nettles @nelsonmullins.com T: 404.322.6000 F: 404.322.6050 nelsonmullins.com July 26, 2024 Via ECF

The Honorable Valerie Figueredo Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, S.D.N.Y. 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 RE: — Vinci Brands, LLC v. Coach, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-05138-LGS Case-Mate’s Letter Motion to Seal Dear Judge Figueredo: Pursuant to Rule I.g.2 of Your Honor’s Individual Practices in Civil Cases, Case-Mate, Inc. (“Case-Mate’’) respectfully requests Your Honor’s approval to file under seal an unredacted copy of Case-Mate’s Opposition to Vinci’s Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint (“Opposition”) and Exhibits 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 thereto. Case-Mate seeks to seal portions of the Opposition that quote documents produced in discovery that have been marked as Confidential pursuant to the Stipulation and Confidentiality Agreement and Order [ECF 233] (the “Confidentiality Stipulation”), as well as Exhibits attached to the Opposition that have likewise been marked Confidential. To ensure its compliance with the Confidentiality Stipulation, Case-Mate is filing a redacted version of the Opposition, redacting reference to the information and documents the parties have previously identified as Confidential. An unredacted version of the Opposition, as well as Confidential Exhibits 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 are submitted with this Letter Motion to Seal for the Court’s consideration. We thank the Court for its attention to this matter.

\ \ \ a Respectfully submitted, U DNF) NA , HON. VALERIE/FIGUEREDO s/ Paige Nettles UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATEDAugust 7, 2024 <. Paige Nettles (Counsel for Case-Mate, Inc.) The Clerk of Court is directed to maintain the seal on ECF No. 447 until August 28, 2024. Case-Mate is directed to make the required showing under Lugosch v.Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) by August 28, 2024 in order to permanently 4 | GEorGIA | ILLINOIS | MARYLAND | MASSACHUSETTS | MINNESOTA maintain the viewing restrictions. The Clerk of OUTH CAROLINA | TENNESSEE | TEXAS | VIRGINIA | WEST VIRGINIA

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vinci Brands LLC v. Coach Services, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Vinci Brands LLC v. Coach Services, Inc. (Vinci Brands LLC v. Coach Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)