Vincent X. Lee v. Gary B. Kempker

79 F. App'x 243
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 23, 2003
Docket03-2735
StatusUnpublished

This text of 79 F. App'x 243 (Vincent X. Lee v. Gary B. Kempker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vincent X. Lee v. Gary B. Kempker, 79 F. App'x 243 (8th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Missouri prisoner Vincent Lee appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 action. Having carefully reviewed the record, we agree with the district court that Lee failed to exhaust available prison administrative remedies as to all claims. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Jones v. Norris, 310 F.3d 610, 612 (8th Cir.2002) (per curiam) (standard of review). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Norris
310 F.3d 610 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 F. App'x 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vincent-x-lee-v-gary-b-kempker-ca8-2003.