Vincent v. Ætna Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vincent v. Ætna Life Insurance

262 A.D. 794, 27 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5873

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 14, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D. 794 (Vincent v. Ætna Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vincent v. Ætna Life Insurance, 262 A.D. 794, 27 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiff Lettie Vincent, in Action No. 1, has appealed from an order consolidating the above-entitled actions and granting the right to open and close to Anne Hand, plaintiff in Action No. 2. These actions arise out of a group policy of insurance issued to Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company insuring the life of Thomas J. Brawley, one of its employees. Mrs. Hand sues as the designated beneficiary of the policy at the time of Brawley’s death. Mrs. Vincent seeks to recover the proceeds of the same policy upon a contract alleged to have been made with her by Brawley during bis lifetime. Mrs. Hand’s action was commenced on September 9, 1940; Mrs. Vincent’s action was commenced on November 15, 1940. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffeman, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff Lettie Vincent, in Action No. 1, has appealed from an order consolidating the above-entitled actions and granting the right to open and close to Anne Hand, plaintiff in Action No. 2. These actions arise out of a group policy of insurance issued to Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company insuring the life of Thomas J. Brawley, one of its employees. Mrs. Hand sues as the designated beneficiary of the policy at the time of Brawley’s death. Mrs. Vincent seeks to recover the proceeds of the same policy upon a contract alleged to have been made with her by Brawley during bis lifetime. Mrs. Hand’s action was commenced on September 9, 1940; Mrs. Vincent’s action was commenced on November 15, 1940. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffeman, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 794, 27 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vincent-v-tna-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1941.