Vincent v. State

104 So. 686, 20 Ala. App. 637, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 145
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 19, 1925·No. 7 Div. 46.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The contention made in appellant’s brief that the record fails to show jurisdiction in the circuit court is met by the return to the certiorari issued by this court on motion of the Attorney General. The record now is complete, showing jurisdiction on appeal from a conviction in the county court.

The whisky was found at defendant’s house on a certain Saturday night, at a time when a number of persons were present. Everything said and done at the time and place cf the finding of ihe whisky was of the res gestee and admissible in evidence.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vincent v. State, 104 So. 686, 20 Ala. App. 637, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 145 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

104 So. 686 (Vincent v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edge v. State
54 So. 2d 312 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1951)
Windham v. State
50 So. 2d 288 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1950)
Nickerson v. State
119 So. 243 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1928)