Vincent v. State

104 So. 686, 20 Ala. App. 637, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 145
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 19, 1925
Docket7 Div. 46.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 104 So. 686 (Vincent v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vincent v. State, 104 So. 686, 20 Ala. App. 637, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 145 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The contention made in appellant’s brief that the record fails to show jurisdiction in the circuit court is met by the return to the certiorari issued by this court on motion of the Attorney General. The record now is complete, showing jurisdiction on appeal from a conviction in the county court.

The whisky was found at defendant’s house on a certain Saturday night, at a time when a number of persons were present. Everything said and done at the time and place cf the finding of ihe whisky was of the res gestee and admissible in evidence.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edge v. State
54 So. 2d 312 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1951)
Windham v. State
50 So. 2d 288 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1950)
Nickerson v. State
119 So. 243 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 So. 686, 20 Ala. App. 637, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vincent-v-state-alactapp-1925.