Vincent v. Mott

125 P. 346, 163 Cal. 342, 1912 Cal. LEXIS 414
California Supreme Court·Decided July 17, 1912·No. S.F. No. 6278.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

It does not appear from the petition presented that the Oakland council has been asked to appoint on the election boards to hold the recall election persons of whom half belong to the Republican party and half to the Democratic party, as required in section 1142 of the Political Code. We think that under the provisions of the charter that section applies to recall elections held under said charter. But because of the failure to aver that the council threatens to disobey that section, the application for mandamus is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vincent v. Mott, 125 P. 346, 163 Cal. 342, 1912 Cal. LEXIS 414 (Cal. 1912).

125 P. 346 (Vincent v. Mott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Linde v. Hall
159 N.W. 281 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1916)
Booth v. Mott
147 P. 953 (California Supreme Court, 1915)
State v. Lewis
91 A. 993 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1914)