Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Vincent v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Vincent v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

35 Misc. 830, 72 N.Y.S. 1132
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1901
StatusPublished

This text of 35 Misc. 830 (Vincent v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vincent v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co., 35 Misc. 830, 72 N.Y.S. 1132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff’s testimony, wholly uncorroborated, is flatly contradicted by the evidence of three disinterested witnesses, and in addition that of the motorman and conductor. The verdict, therefore, is manifestly against the weight of evidence.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial- ordered, with costs to abide event.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Misc. 830, 72 N.Y.S. 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vincent-v-metropolitan-street-railway-co-nyappterm-1901.