Vincent v. Geithner

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vincent v. Geithner. Read the opinion of the Court — 890 F. Supp. 2d 8 →

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided August 31, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2011-2018·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ODESSA F. VINCENT, ) )

Plaintiff, ) )

v. ) Civil Case No. 11-2018 (RJL) )

TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, eta/. ) )

Defendants. )

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this s+ ~ day of August, 2012, hereby ORDERED that the defendants' Motions to Dismiss [Dkts. #7, #9] are

GRANTED.

ORDERED that plaintiffs Complaint [#1] is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ODESSA F. VINCENT, ) )

Plaintiff, ) )

v. ) Civil Case No. 11-2018 (RJL) )

TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, eta/. ) )

Defendants. )

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this s+ ~ day of August, 2012, hereby ORDERED that the defendants' Motions to Dismiss [Dkts. #7, #9] are

GRANTED.

ORDERED that plaintiffs Complaint [#1] is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

United States District Judge

Vincent v. Geithner, (D.D.C. 2012).

Pincite

Vincent v. Geithner (Vincent v. Geithner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.