Vincent v. Clouse
This text of Vincent v. Clouse (Vincent v. Clouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0005130 16-MAR-2015 11:14 AM
SCWC-13-0005130
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
DANA E. VINCENT, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
JACQUELINE CLOUSE, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0005130; CIVIL NO. 10-1-2336)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee Dana E. Vincent’s
Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on February 6, 2015, is hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 16, 2015.
Randall L.K.M. Rosenberg /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald Charles E. McKay and Moana A. Yost /s/ Paula A. Nakayama for petitioner
Jonathan L. Ortiz and /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna Wade J. Katano for respondent /s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vincent v. Clouse, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vincent-v-clouse-haw-2015.