Vincent Robert Napoli, A/K/A Jimmy Napoli and Robert Grene v. United States

341 F.2d 916
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 2, 1965
Docket21049
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 341 F.2d 916 (Vincent Robert Napoli, A/K/A Jimmy Napoli and Robert Grene v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vincent Robert Napoli, A/K/A Jimmy Napoli and Robert Grene v. United States, 341 F.2d 916 (5th Cir. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

There was ample evidence as to each of the appellants to sustain the verdict of the jury and judgments of conviction.

In the absence of any showing of prejudice resulting from the holding of trial twelve days after the arraignment of Grene, we can not determine that the trial court erred in denying the motion for continuance.

No exceptions having been made to the charge as given by the trial court, we find no reversible error in the failure of the court to give a specific charge on the accomplice testimony in view of the adequacy of the charge as a whole.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Terry Ray Uptain
531 F.2d 1281 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
Robert Grene v. United States
360 F.2d 585 (Fifth Circuit, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
341 F.2d 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vincent-robert-napoli-aka-jimmy-napoli-and-robert-grene-v-united-states-ca5-1965.