Vincent Lomax v. City of Joplin, MO
This text of Vincent Lomax v. City of Joplin, MO (Vincent Lomax v. City of Joplin, MO) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________
No. 97-1226WM _____________
Vincent L. Lomax, * * Appellant, * * Carol Lomax, * On Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Plaintiff, * Western District of Missouri. * v. * [Not to be Published] * City of Joplin, Missouri, * * Appellee. * *
___________
Submitted: October 3, 1997 Filed: October 27, 1997 ___________
Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, McMILLIAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM. Vincent Lomax appeals1 from the District Court&s 2 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City of Joplin, Missouri, and others. Upon review of the record and the parties& submissions on appeal, we conclude that the judgment of the District Court is correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1 We reject appellees& suggestion that the notice of appeal is untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Van Orman v. Purkett, 43 F.3d 1201, 1202 (8th Cir. 1994). 2 The Honorable Joseph E. Stevens, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vincent Lomax v. City of Joplin, MO, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vincent-lomax-v-city-of-joplin-mo-ca8-1997.