Vincent Lomax v. City of Joplin, MO
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1226WM
Vincent L. Lomax, *
*
Appellant, *
*
Carol Lomax, * On Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Plaintiff, * Western District of Missouri.
*
v. * [Not to be Published]
*
City of Joplin, Missouri, *
*
Appellee. *
*
Submitted: October 3, 1997 Filed: October 27, 1997
Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, McMILLIAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Vincent Lomax appeals1 from the District Court&s 2 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City of Joplin, Missouri, and others. Upon review of the record and the parties& submissions on appeal, we conclude that the judgment of the District Court is correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1 We reject appellees& suggestion that the notice of appeal is untimely. See Fed.
R. App. P. 4(c); Van Orman v. Purkett, 43 F.3d 1201, 1202 (8th Cir. 1994).
2 The Honorable Joseph E. Stevens, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vincent Lomax v. City of Joplin, MO (Vincent Lomax v. City of Joplin, MO) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.