Vincent Lee v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary

396 F.2d 952
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedApril 30, 1968
Docket9667
StatusPublished

This text of 396 F.2d 952 (Vincent Lee v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vincent Lee v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, 396 F.2d 952 (10th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

396 F.2d 952

Vincent LEE, Appellant,
v.
Sherman H. CROUSE, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Appellee.

No. 9667.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

March 27, 1968, Rehearing Denied April 30, 1968.

Vincent Lee, pro se.

Robert C. Londerholm, Atty. Gen., and Daniel D. Metz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PICKETT, LEWIS and HICKEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum opinion. See 284 F.Supp. 541.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lee v. Crouse
284 F. Supp. 541 (D. Kansas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
396 F.2d 952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vincent-lee-v-sherman-h-crouse-warden-kansas-state-penitentiary-ca10-1968.