Vincent Lee Foreman, Sr. v. Edward Murray, James Smith, James Snodgrass, H.E. Norman

840 F.2d 10, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1852, 1988 WL 12856

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 17, 1988
• Docket: 87-7739
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

840 F.2d 10
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Vincent Lee FOREMAN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward MURRAY, James Smith, James Snodgrass, H.E. Norman,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-7739.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 28, 1987.
Decided Feb. 17, 1988.

Vincent Lee Foreman, Sr., appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER, SPROUSE, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Vincent Foreman appeals the district court's dismissal of this 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action for failure to pay the assessed filing fee. Finding that the district court properly complied with the procedures approved in Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action without prejudice, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

AFFIRMED.