Vincent C. Donovan v. Alberto Gonzales

186 F. App'x 690
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 5, 2006
Docket05-3596
StatusUnpublished

This text of 186 F. App'x 690 (Vincent C. Donovan v. Alberto Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vincent C. Donovan v. Alberto Gonzales, 186 F. App'x 690 (8th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Vincent Donovan is serving a 212-month prison sentence imposed in the Eastern District of Wisconsin after a jury found him guilty of participating in a drug conspiracy and related offenses. See United States v. Donovan, 24 F.3d 908 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 905, 115 S.Ct. 269, 130 L.Ed.2d 187 (1994). From his current place of confinement at the Federal Prison Camp in Yankton, South Dakota, Donovan filed this 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in June 2005, challenging the government’s legal authority to charge him under 21 U.S.C. § 841, because “he was/is not [a member] of the ‘class’ of persons whom the statute sweeps into its criminal ambit.” The district court 1 dismissed Donovan’s petition, finding his inability to file a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion did not make section 2255 inadequate or ineffective, and he appeals. Following careful review, see Hill v. Morrison, 349 F.3d 1089, 1091 (8th Cir. 2003), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. The government’s pending motion to expand the appellate record and take judicial notice of the previous 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition is granted.

1

. The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Danny Ray Hill v. Marvin D. Morrison
349 F.3d 1089 (Eighth Circuit, 2003)
T. H. v. T. H.
513 U.S. 905 (Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 F. App'x 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vincent-c-donovan-v-alberto-gonzales-ca8-2006.