Vincent Burgess v. Attorney Grievance Commission
This text of Vincent Burgess v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Vincent Burgess v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
July 20, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
157452 Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Kurtis T. Wilder VINCENT BURGESS, Elizabeth T. Clement, Plaintiff, Justices
v SC: 157452
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. We further find that the plaintiff is a vexatious litigator under MCR 7.316(C)(3). We direct the Clerk of this Court not to accept any further filings from plaintiff in any matter against the Attorney Grievance Commission without the filing fee required by MCR 7.319.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. July 20, 2018 a0613 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vincent Burgess v. Attorney Grievance Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vincent-burgess-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2018.