Vincent Burgess v. Attorney Grievance Commission
This text of Vincent Burgess v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Vincent Burgess v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
February 28, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman 147454(6) Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, VINCENT BURGESS, Justices Plaintiff, v SC: 147454 AGC: 0838-13 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November 25, 2013 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 28, 2014 d0224 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vincent Burgess v. Attorney Grievance Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vincent-burgess-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2014.