Vincent Bernard Jenkins v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 7, 2014·No. 05-14-00195-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered July 7, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00195-CR

VINCENT BERNARD JENKINS, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-53064-V

ORDER

The reporter’s record and the original plea agreement in this case reflect appellant

pleaded true to two enhancement paragraphs. On June 3, 2014, this Court ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to file a supplemental record that contained the State’s notice to enhance the punishment range. The District Clerk filed a supplemental record that contained the plea agreement to the probation revocation, but not the notice of intent to enhance punishment.

We ORDER the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether the record can be supplemented with the State’s notice to seek enhancement on punishment. We ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental record containing the written findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vincent Bernard Jenkins v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Vincent Bernard Jenkins v. State (Vincent Bernard Jenkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.