Vincent Amato v. United States

Third Circuit

Vincent Amato v. United States

374 F.2d 36

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 10, 1967·No. 16247_1·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

OPINION OP THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the refusal of a sentencing court, long after conviction and commitment, to reduce a sentence by the number of days of the appellant’s, incarceration while awaiting trial.

The sentence in question was substantially less than the maximum provided by Congress. The judge who denied the-present request fbr relief is the judge who imposed the sentence originally. This sentence was imposed long before' the effective date of the provision of the Bail Reform Act of 1966 concerning credit for presentence incarceration.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OP THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the refusal of a sentencing court, long after conviction and commitment, to reduce a sentence by the number of days of the appellant’s, incarceration while awaiting trial.

The sentence in question was substantially less than the maximum provided by Congress. The judge who denied the-present request fbr relief is the judge who imposed the sentence originally. This sentence was imposed long before' the effective date of the provision of the Bail Reform Act of 1966 concerning credit for presentence incarceration.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Vincent Amato v. United States, 374 F.2d 36 (3d Cir. 1967).

Pincite

374 F.2d 36 (Vincent Amato v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related