Vincent Alonzo Corson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 31, 2015·No. 03-15-00055-CR·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 03-15-00055-CR 4703837 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/31/2015 11:41:41 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK NO. 03-15-00055-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS AT AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/31/2015 11:41:41 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk **************** VINCENT ALONZO CORSON

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS **************** ON APPEAL FROM THE 426th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, TEXAS CAUSE NO. 72,778 **************** STATE’S BRIEF ****************

HENRY GARZA DISTRICT ATTORNEY 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

BOB D. ODOM Assistant District Attorney P.O. Box 540 Belton, Texas 76513 (254) 933-5215 / (254) 933-5704 Fax DistrictAttorney@co.bell.tx.us

ATTORNEYS FOR THE STATE

i TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Authorities ................................................................................................................. ii

Appellant’s Brief ......................................................................................................................... 1

Prayer ............................................................................................................................................ 2

Certificate of Compliance with Rule 9 ................................................................................. 2

Certificate of Service ................................................................................................................ 3

ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967) ................................................................................................... 1

Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Cr.App.1969) ........................................................................................................ 1

iii APPELLANT'S BRIEF

After a review of the record, the Appellant's counsel concludes that the

appeal is frivolous and that there are no arguable points of error (Appellant’s

Brief, pp. 1, 7).

Wherefore, Premises Considered, the State of Texas prays that the

decision of the Trial Court be affirmed, Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87

S.Ct. 1396 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 Tex.Cr.App.1969).

1 PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, and since no reversible

error is shown, the State respectfully prays that this Court affirm the

conviction.

Respectfully submitted,

HENRY L. GARZA DISTRICT ATTORNEY 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

/s/ Bob D. Odom BOB D. ODOM Assistant District Attorney P. O. Box 540 Belton, Texas 76513 Bar I.D. # 15200000 (254) 933-5215 / (254) 933-5704 Fax DistrictAttorney@co.bell.tx.us

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 9

This is to certify that the State’s Brief is in compliance with Rule 9 of the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and that portion which must be included

Under Rule 9.4(i)(1) contains 369 words.

/s/ Bob D. Odom BOB D. ODOM Assistant District Attorney

2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the State's Brief has

been sent by e-service to the e-mail address: ecopeland63@yahoo.com,

provided by the Attorney of Record, Erika Copeland, on this the 30th day of

March, 2015.

HENRY L. GARZA DISTRICT ATTORNEY 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

/s/ Bob D. Odom BOB D. ODOM Assistant District Attorney P. O. Box 540 Belton, Texas 76513 Bar I.D. # 15200000 (254) 933-5215 / (254) 933-5704 Fax DistrictAttorney@co.bell.tx.us

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vincent Alonzo Corson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Vincent Alonzo Corson v. State (Vincent Alonzo Corson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Gainous v. State
436 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)