Vincent A. Sheehy III v. Edwin H. Estes
This text of 324 F.2d 502 (Vincent A. Sheehy III v. Edwin H. Estes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In deciding the plaintiffs’ claim in an action where jurisdiction was based on diversity of citizenship, the district court severed a counterclaim for future disposition, and thereafter entered a judgment, from which this appeal stems, against the appellants. Some of the specifications of error raise questions of Alabama law which we think were properly decided by the district court. The other contentions of the appellants present procedural questions, and as to these we conclude that no error is apparent and no prejudice is shown. The judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
324 F.2d 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vincent-a-sheehy-iii-v-edwin-h-estes-ca5-1963.