Vincent A. Palisi v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Inc.

342 F.2d 799, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6044
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 2, 1965·No. 21728·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The District Court did not err in rendering judgment under Rule 50(b), F.R. Civ.P., for defendant railroad company notwithstanding the jury verdict for plaintiff. Applying the test which controls in directing a verdict so as to cast the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, see Turner v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, 5 Cir., 1961, 292 F.2d 586; Hogan v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 325 F.2d 276, we conclude that there was no substantial evidence that any negligence on the part of the railroad company was the proximate cause of the death in question, and for that reason plaintiff was not entitled to have his case submitted to the jury.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vincent A. Palisi v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Inc., 342 F.2d 799, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6044 (5th Cir. 1965).

342 F.2d 799 (Vincent A. Palisi v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related