Vinbill Corp. v. Morrison

19 A.D.2d 659, 241 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3562
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 24, 1963·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In two actions to recover the balance allegedly due for goods sold and delivered, brought separately by the same plaintiff against each of two corporations having a common principal officer and stockholder, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County, dated June 14, 1962, which denied its motion to consolidate such actions for joint trial. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion for consolidation granted. In our opinion, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny consolidation of these actions for trial. So far as appears from the record, both actions involve related transactions; the issues and the witnesses will be the same in both; and we see no material prejudice to the defendants resulting from consolidation. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vinbill Corp. v. Morrison, 19 A.D.2d 659, 241 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3562 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

19 A.D.2d 659 (Vinbill Corp. v. Morrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chinatown Apartments, Inc. v. New York City Transit Authority
100 A.D.2d 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)