Vinal v. West Virginia Oil & Oil Land Co.
110 U.S. 215, 4 S. Ct. 4, 28 L. Ed. 124, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1678
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This judgment is affirmed. One partner cannot recover his share of a debt due to the partnership in an action at law, prosecuted in his own name alone against the debtor. That is the only question presented by the bill of exceptions in this casé. The refusal of the' court below to grant a new trial is not reviewable here.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vinal v. West Virginia Oil & Oil Land Co., 110 U.S. 215, 4 S. Ct. 4, 28 L. Ed. 124, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1678 (1884).
110 U.S. 215 (Vinal v. West Virginia Oil & Oil Land Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J. Fred Creek v. Village of Westhaven
80 F.3d 186 (Seventh Circuit, 1996)
McBride v. Davis
61 Pa. D. & C.2d 599 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1972)
Eastern Metals Corporation v. Martin
191 F. Supp. 245 (S.D. New York, 1960)
Leh v. General Petroleum Corporation
165 F. Supp. 933 (S.D. California, 1958)
City Stores Co. v. Shull
161 F. Supp. 459 (D. Maryland, 1958)
Grant County Deposit Bank v. McCampbell
194 F.2d 469 (Sixth Circuit, 1952)
Charne v. Essex Chair Co.
92 F. Supp. 164 (D. New Jersey, 1950)
Globe Indemnity Co. v. Atlantic Lighterage Corp.
2 N.E.2d 640 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)
Doleman v. Levine
295 U.S. 221 (Supreme Court, 1935)
Crystal Copper Co. v. Gaido
5 F.2d 881 (Ninth Circuit, 1925)
Hood v. Warren
87 So. 524 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)
Ingham Lumber Co. v. Ingersoll
125 S.W. 139 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1910)
Miller & Son v. Freeman
51 L.R.A. 504 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)