Villon v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.
Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCCQ-11-0000747
28-NOV-2011
12:29 PM
NO. SCCQ-11-0000747
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
BERT VILLON and MARK APANA, Plaintiffs,
vs.
MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., dba WAILEA MARRIOTT RESORT, Defendant.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
RENELDO RODRIGUEZ and JOHNSON BASLER, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,
vs.
STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC., dba WESTIN MAUI RESORT & SPA, Defendant.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the plaintiffs' motion for
reconsideration of the November 8, 2011 ruling on the certified
question, it appears that the motion for reconsideration -- filed
on November 21, 2011 -- was not filed within 10 days after the
filing of the November 8, 2011 ruling. See HRAP 40(a) ("A motion
for reconsideration may be filed by a party only within 10 days
after the filing of the opinion, dispositional order, or ruling
unless by special leave additional time is granted during such
period by a judge or justice of the appellate court involved.").
Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for
reconsideration is denied as untimely.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, November 28, 2011.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Villon v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc. (Villon v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.