Villon v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Villon v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 130 Haw. 130
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided November 28, 2011·No. SCCQ-11-0000747·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCCQ-11-0000747

28-NOV-2011

12:29 PM

NO. SCCQ-11-0000747

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

BERT VILLON and MARK APANA, Plaintiffs,

vs.

MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., dba WAILEA MARRIOTT RESORT, Defendant.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

RENELDO RODRIGUEZ and JOHNSON BASLER, on behalf of

themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,

vs.

STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC., dba WESTIN MAUI RESORT & SPA, Defendant.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the plaintiffs' motion for

reconsideration of the November 8, 2011 ruling on the certified

question, it appears that the motion for reconsideration -- filed

on November 21, 2011 -- was not filed within 10 days after the

filing of the November 8, 2011 ruling. See HRAP 40(a) ("A motion

for reconsideration may be filed by a party only within 10 days

after the filing of the opinion, dispositional order, or ruling

unless by special leave additional time is granted during such

period by a judge or justice of the appellate court involved.").

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for

reconsideration is denied as untimely.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, November 28, 2011.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Villon v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc., (haw 2011).

Villon v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc. (Villon v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.