Villnave, Steven Edward
This text of Villnave, Steven Edward (Villnave, Steven Edward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-64,007-09
EX PARTE STEVEN EDWARD VILLNAVE, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W11-22458-U (A) IN THE 291st DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offense of
felony driving while intoxicated and sentenced to imprisonment for ten years.
The Applicant alleges, inter alia, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance in this
case. The State responded to this allegation as follows, in pertinent part:
The State contends that Applicant was provided with effective assistance of counsel. The State, however, recognizes that further evidence may be needed regarding counsel’s representation of Applicant. Therefore, the State requests that this Court issue an order designating issues and gather evidence, as is customary, by way of affidavit from defense counsel or hearing should the Court deem such to be necessary. On May 17, 2014, a timely order designating issues was signed by the trial court ordering,
in part, that the issue of whether Applicant received ineffective assistance of trial counsel be
resolved. The habeas record has was then properly forwarded to this Court, but without the
designated issue having been resolved by the trial court. We remand this application to the 291st
District Court of Dallas County to allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiary investigation and
enter findings of fact and conclusions of law.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
be obtained from this Court.
Filed: April 29, 2015 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Villnave, Steven Edward, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villnave-steven-edward-texcrimapp-2015.